
FirePro W5000
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W5000 is positioned at rank #216 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6990 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W5000.
| Insight | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $498), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1125.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1125.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($498) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W5000 and Radeon HD 6990

FirePro W5000
The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 6990
The Radeon HD 6990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,014 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the Radeon HD 6990 reaches 3,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6990 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6990). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6990).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,967 | 3,014+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+101% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48 | 96 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W5000) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6990). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6+20% | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W5000) vs None (Radeon HD 6990). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6990).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6990's 375W — a 133.3% difference. The FirePro W5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 750W (Radeon HD 6990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 183mm vs 310mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-80% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 183mm | 310mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.6+395% | 8.0 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W5000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 6990 launched at $699 and now averages $498. The FirePro W5000 costs 92% less ($458 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.2 (FirePro W5000) vs 6.1 (Radeon HD 6990) — the FirePro W5000 offers 1116.4% better value. The FirePro W5000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-14% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-92% | $498 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.2+1116% | 6.1 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Antilles |
| Release | August 7 2012 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #585 | #583 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















