
FirePro W5000

Radeon HD 6990
FirePro W5000 vs Radeon HD 6990 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W5000 vs Radeon HD 6990 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W5000 vs Radeon HD 6990: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 375W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅Measures 183mm instead of 310mm, a 127mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 6990
2011Why buy it
- ✅FirePro W5000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 6990 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 375W vs 75W.
- ❌69.4% longer card at 310mm vs 183mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W5000 vs Radeon HD 6990 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W5000
The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 6990
The Radeon HD 6990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,014 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the Radeon HD 6990 reaches 3,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6990 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6990). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6990).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,967 | 3,014+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+101% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48 | 96 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6990.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W5000) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6990). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6+20% | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W5000) vs None (Radeon HD 6990). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6990).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6990's 375W — a 133.3% difference. The FirePro W5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 750W (Radeon HD 6990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 183mm vs 310mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-80% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 183mm | 310mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.6+395% | 8.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W5000 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 6990 launched at $699. On MSRP, FirePro W5000 was 14.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro W5000) vs 4.3 (Radeon HD 6990) — the FirePro W5000 offers 16.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W5000 (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-14% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+16% | 4.3 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Antilles |
| Release | August 7 2012 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #585 | #583 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














