
FirePro W5000
Popular choices:

FirePro W5100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W5000 is positioned at rank 216 and the FirePro W5100 is on rank 166, so the FirePro W5100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5000
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W5000.
| Insight | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W5000 and FirePro W5100

FirePro W5000
The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

FirePro W5100
The FirePro W5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 31 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,987 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the FirePro W5100 reaches 2,987 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W5100 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 768 (FirePro W5100). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W5100).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,967 | 2,987 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS | 1.428 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W5000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W5100 has 4 GB. The FirePro W5100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W5000) vs 256 KB (FirePro W5100) — the FirePro W5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W5000) vs 12 (FirePro W5100). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.2.170. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.2.170 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W5000) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W5100). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5100).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the FirePro W5100's 50W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 350W (FirePro W5100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 183mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.6 | 59.7+51% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W5000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro W5100 launched at $399 and now averages $50. The FirePro W5000 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.2 (FirePro W5000) vs 59.7 (FirePro W5100) — the FirePro W5000 offers 24.3% better value. The FirePro W5100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W5000 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $399-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.2+24% | 59.7 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Bonaire |
| Release | August 7 2012 | March 31 2014 |
| Ranking | #585 | #582 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












