GRID M10-4Q
Quadro K1200
GRID M10-4Q vs Quadro K1200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-4Q vs Quadro K1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID M10-4Q vs Quadro K1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-4Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌835% HIGHER MSRP$2,805 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.
Quadro K1200
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,505 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 831.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-4Q vs Quadro K1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.
Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-4Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,977 | 2,965 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+58% | 1.0578 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+26% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-4Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K1200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K1200.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 45W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 65.9+399% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-4Q came in at $2805, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro K1200 was 89.3% cheaper ($2505 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 9.9 (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 offers 800% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-4Q (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2805 | $300-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 9.9+800% |
| Codename | GM107 | GM107 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | January 28 2015 |
| Ranking | #622 | #586 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-4Q and Quadro K1200
