FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q

FirePro W5100

2014Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID M10-4Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5100

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,406 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
  • Delivers 605.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-4Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 603% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,805 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W5100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (2,987 vs 2,977), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W5100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W5100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,406 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $2,805, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 605.4% (7.5 vs 1.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W5100

The FirePro W5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 31 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,987 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-4Q

The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5100 scores 2,987 and the GRID M10-4Q reaches 2,977 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5100) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W5100) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q).

FeatureFirePro W5100GRID M10-4Q
G3D Mark Score
2,987
2,977
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+20%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS+17%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+20%
40
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W5100GRID M10-4Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-4Q carries 2 GB. FirePro W5100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5100 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W5100) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W5100GRID M10-4Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5100 draws 50W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The FirePro W5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5100) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro W5100GRID M10-4Q
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
59.7+352%
13.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W5100 came in at $399, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805. On MSRP, FirePro W5100 was 85.8% cheaper ($2406 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.5 (FirePro W5100) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) — the FirePro W5100 offers 581.8% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-4Q (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W5100GRID M10-4Q
MSRP
$399-86%
$2805
Performance per Dollar
7.5+582%
1.1
Codename
Bonaire
GM107
Release
March 31 2014
May 18 2016
Ranking
#582
#622

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.