
FirePro W5100

GRID M10-4Q
FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W5100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,406 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 605.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID M10-4Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌603% HIGHER MSRP$2,805 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W5100 vs GRID M10-4Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W5100
The FirePro W5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 31 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,987 points.

GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W5100 scores 2,987 and the GRID M10-4Q reaches 2,977 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5100) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W5100) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q).
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,987 | 2,977 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+17% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W5100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-4Q carries 2 GB. FirePro W5100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5100 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W5100) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W5100 draws 50W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The FirePro W5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5100) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.7+352% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W5100 came in at $399, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805. On MSRP, FirePro W5100 was 85.8% cheaper ($2406 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.5 (FirePro W5100) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) — the FirePro W5100 offers 581.8% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-4Q (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-86% | $2805 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5+582% | 1.1 |
| Codename | Bonaire | GM107 |
| Release | March 31 2014 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #582 | #622 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














