
FirePro W5100

Radeon R9 360
FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W5100
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌303% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Radeon R9 360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅FirePro W5100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 360 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 173mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W5100
The FirePro W5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 31 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,987 points.

Radeon R9 360
The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W5100 scores 2,987 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5100) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W5100) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360).
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,987 | 3,032+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS+51% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W5100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 360 carries 2 GB. FirePro W5100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5100 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 360.
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W5100) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W5100) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360).
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W5100 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 165mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 59.7 | 101.1+69% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W5100 came in at $399, while the Radeon R9 360 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R9 360 was 75.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.5 (FirePro W5100) vs 30.6 (Radeon R9 360) — the Radeon R9 360 offers 308% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 360 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $99-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 30.6+308% |
| Codename | Bonaire | Tropo |
| Release | March 31 2014 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #582 | #711 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














