Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2075

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W5100

2014Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W5100
4 GB 50
2,987
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 M380
brand logoRadeon R9 350
brand logoRadeon HD 5970
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 6850M
brand logoRadeon RX 8050S
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT
Tesla C2075
2 GB 247
3,017
+1.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 v2
brand logoGeForce MX330
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5100

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 247W, a 197W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅FirePro W5100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla C2075 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • ❌394% higher power demand at 247W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla C2075 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (3,017 vs 2,987), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tesla C2075 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W5100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W5100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Tesla C2075 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W5100

The FirePro W5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 31 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,987 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5100 scores 2,987 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5100) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W5100) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).

FeatureFirePro W5100Tesla C2075
G3D Mark Score
2,987
3,017+1%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768+71%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS+39%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
48
56+17%
L1 Cache
192 KB
896 KB+367%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W5100Tesla C2075
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 carries 2 GB. FirePro W5100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5100 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W5100) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W5100Tesla C2075
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W5100) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro W5100Tesla C2075
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+500%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).

FeatureFirePro W5100Tesla C2075
Encoder
VCE 2.0
—
Decoder
UVD 4.2
—
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5100 draws 50W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 132.7% difference. The FirePro W5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5100) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro W5100Tesla C2075
TDP
50W-80%
247W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
59.7+389%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W5100 came in at $399, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. On MSRP, Tesla C2075 was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.5 (FirePro W5100) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W5100 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro W5100Tesla C2075
MSRP
$399
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
7.5
Infinity
Codename
Bonaire
GF110
Release
March 31 2014
July 25 2011
Ranking
#582
#553
Search FirePro W5100 on AmazonSearch Tesla C2075 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.