
GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon Steam Deck 8CU

GRID M10-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-4Q is positioned at rank #344 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-4Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-4Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-4Q.
| Insight | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-4Q and Radeon Steam Deck 8CU

GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 9 2023. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1900 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 and the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-4Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU uses RDNA 2, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 512 (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,977 | 3,000 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1900 MHz+45% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 350W (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 100.0+658% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805 MSRP and currently averages $340, while the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU costs 100+% less ($340 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.8 (GRID M10-4Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU) — the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2805 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $340 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | RDNA 2 Sephiroth |
| Release | May 18 2016 | November 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #622 | #480 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















