Radeon HD 7310G vs FirePro 3D V3700
Radeon HD 7310G
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7310G is positioned at rank 269 and the FirePro 3D V3700 is on rank 303, so the Radeon HD 7310G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7310G
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7310G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3700.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7310G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7310G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7310G and FirePro 3D V3700
Radeon HD 7310G
The Radeon HD 7310G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $59.
FirePro 3D V3700
The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7310G scores 181 and the FirePro 3D V3700 reaches 179 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7310G is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro 3D V3700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3700).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 181+1% | 179 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+467% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 512 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7310G comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3700 has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 7310G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3700) — the FirePro 3D V3700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+11% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs UVD (FirePro 3D V3700). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7310G draws 47W versus the FirePro 3D V3700's 274W — a 141.4% difference. The Radeon HD 7310G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 47W-83% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9+457% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7310G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the FirePro 3D V3700 launched at $99 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.1 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 17.9 (FirePro 3D V3700) — the Radeon HD 7310G offers 1.1% better value. The FirePro 3D V3700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-49% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.1+1% | 17.9 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Tahiti |
| Release | May 1 2013 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #841 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7310G and FirePro 3D V3700
