Radeon HD 7310G vs GeForce 9400 GT
Radeon HD 7310G
Popular choices:
GeForce 9400 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7310G is positioned at rank 269 and the GeForce 9400 GT is on rank 573, so the Radeon HD 7310G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7310G
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9400 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7310G.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7310G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7310G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 89.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+89.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7310G and GeForce 9400 GT
Radeon HD 7310G
The Radeon HD 7310G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $59.
GeForce 9400 GT
The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 7310G scores 181 versus the GeForce 9400 GT's 191 — the GeForce 9400 GT leads by 5.5%. The Radeon HD 7310G is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 9400 GT uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 384 (GeForce 9400 GT). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 181 | 191+6% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 0.9032 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 192 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7310G comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9400 GT has 1 GB. The GeForce 9400 GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) — the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9400 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+12% | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs No (GeForce 9400 GT). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo HD VP2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7310G draws 47W versus the GeForce 9400 GT's 33W — a 35% difference. The GeForce 9400 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 350W (GeForce 9400 GT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 47W | 33W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9 | 5.8+49% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7310G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9400 GT launched at $59 and now averages $20. The Radeon HD 7310G costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.1 (Radeon HD 7310G) vs 9.6 (GeForce 9400 GT) — the Radeon HD 7310G offers 88.5% better value. The GeForce 9400 GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310G | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-15% | $59 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.1+89% | 9.6 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GM108 |
| Release | May 1 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #841 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7310G and GeForce 9400 GT
