Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual
VS
GeForce GTS 250

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual vs GeForce GTS 250

AMD

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 825 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250

2010Core: 783 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual is positioned at rank 535 and the GeForce GTS 250 is on rank 246, so the GeForce GTS 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual

#524
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2835%
#526
2570%
#527
2563%
#531
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2331%
#532
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2315%
#535
100%
#537
99%
#538
Radeon R7 M445
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#539
Mobility Radeon HD 540v
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#540
98%
#541
97%
#542
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#543
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#544
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#545
96%
#546
96%
#547
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#548
95%
#549
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 250

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1645%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1580%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1562%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1559%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1556%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1547%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1528%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1522%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1508%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1504%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1486%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1483%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1456%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1455%
#231
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1814%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
100%
#248
GeForce G100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
100%
#249
Radeon R7 M265
MSRP: $130|Avg: $30
98%
#250
Radeon HD 8250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#251
Radeon HD 3300
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
96%
#253
Radeon R5 220
MSRP: $35|Avg: $15
95%
#254
Radeon HD 7350
MSRP: $40|Avg: $10
94%
#255
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
93%
#256
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
92%
#257
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
#258
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
91%
#259
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
90%
#260
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M DualGeForce GTS 250
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTS 250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTS 250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 48.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M DualGeForce GTS 250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+48.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual and GeForce GTS 250

AMD

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 575 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250

The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual scores 575 and the GeForce GTS 250 reaches 569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 250).

FeatureRadeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M DualGeForce GTS 250
G3D Mark Score
575+1%
569
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+233%
192

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M DualGeForce GTS 250
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTS 250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M DualGeForce GTS 250
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual draws 50W versus the GeForce GTS 250's 106W — a 71.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual) vs 450W (GeForce GTS 250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M DualGeForce GTS 250
TDP
50W-53%
106W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
11.5+113%
5.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTS 250 launched at $129 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTS 250 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual) vs 28.4 (GeForce GTS 250) — the GeForce GTS 250 offers 47.9% better value. The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 7520G + HD 7700M DualGeForce GTS 250
MSRP
$150
$129-14%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$20-33%
Performance per Dollar
19.2
28.4+48%
Codename
GF106
Release
August 1 2013
September 13 2010
Ranking
#863
#791