CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual is positioned at rank 623 and the Radeon R5 310 is on rank 424, so the Radeon R5 310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $35), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 135.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+135.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual and Radeon R5 310
Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 329 points.
Radeon R5 310
The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual scores 329 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 329 | 332 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6 | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Radeon R5 310 costs 57.1% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.4 (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual) vs 22.1 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 135.1% better value. The Radeon R5 310 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140 | $49-65% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $15-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4 | 22.1+135% |
| Codename | — | Weston |
| Release | August 1 2013 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #881 | #873 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual and Radeon R5 310
