GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 230

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $96 less on MSRP ($44 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • Delivers 212.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($44 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

2013

Why buy it

  • 12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 218.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $140 MSRPvs$44 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $44 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (329 vs 323), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $96 cheaper on MSRP at $44 vs $140, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 212.4% (7.3 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230

The GeForce GT 230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 329 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 230 scores 323 and the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual reaches 329 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230) vs 768 (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual).

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
G3D Mark Score
323
329+2%
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual.

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 230 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
10.8+64%
6.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 230 came in at $44, while the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual launched at $140. On MSRP, GeForce GT 230 was 68.6% cheaper ($96 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.3 (GeForce GT 230) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual) — the GeForce GT 230 offers 204.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 230 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
MSRP
$44-69%
$140
Performance per Dollar
7.3+204%
2.4
Codename
GP108
Release
May 17 2017
August 1 2013
Ranking
#641
#881

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.