GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon R5 310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 230

2017

Why buy it

✅23.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($44 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
11.4% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$44 MSRP
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 310 instead at 332 vs 323, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5 cheaper on MSRP at $44 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8.3% (7.3 vs 6.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 230

The GeForce GT 230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 230 scores 323 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 230 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score	323	332+3%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+43%	0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1468 MHz+43%	1024 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB+50%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 230) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce GT 230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 230 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon R5 310
TDP	30W-40%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	10.8+64%	6.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 230 came in at $44, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce GT 230 was 10.2% cheaper ($5 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.3 (GeForce GT 230) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce GT 230 offers 7.4% better value.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon R5 310
MSRP	$44-10%	$49
Performance per Dollar	7.3+7%	6.8
Codename	GP108	Weston
Release	May 17 2017	April 18 2017
Ranking	#641	#873

Search GeForce GT 230 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.