GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon E6460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon E6460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon E6460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 230

2017

Why buy it

✅2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $106 less on MSRP ($44 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 239.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($44 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
240.9% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$44 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $44 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E6460 instead at 324 vs 323, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $106 cheaper on MSRP at $44 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 239.9% (7.3 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon E6460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 230

The GeForce GT 230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 230 scores 323 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 230 is built on Pascal while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon E6460
G3D Mark Score	323	324
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon E6460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6460.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon E6460
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 230 draws 30W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon E6460
TDP	30W-33%	45W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	10.8+50%	7.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 230 came in at $44, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GT 230 was 70.7% cheaper ($106 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.3 (GeForce GT 230) vs 2.2 (Radeon E6460) — the GeForce GT 230 offers 231.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 230 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 230	Radeon E6460
MSRP	$44-71%	$150
Performance per Dollar	7.3+232%	2.2
Codename	GP108	Turks
Release	May 17 2017	May 2 2011
Ranking	#641	#923

Search GeForce GT 230 on Amazon

Search Radeon E6460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.