GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7450M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7450M

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7450M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7450M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7450M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 230

2017

Why buy it

  • 10.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($44 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7450M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $44 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7450M instead at 330 vs 323, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 230 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon HD 7450M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230

The GeForce GT 230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon HD 7450M

The Radeon HD 7450M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 230 scores 323 and the Radeon HD 7450M reaches 330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 230 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7450M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7450M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7450M).

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7450M
G3D Mark Score
323
330+2%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+30%
0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
144 KB
160 KB+11%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7450M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7450M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 230 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7450M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7450M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230 and System on the Radeon HD 7450M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 230) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7450M) — the GeForce GT 230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7450M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 230 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7450M's 40W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GT 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7450M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7450M
TDP
30W-25%
40W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
10.8+30%
8.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 230 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 230Radeon HD 7450M
MSRP
$44
Codename
GP108
Heathrow
Release
May 17 2017
April 24 2012
Ranking
#641
#787

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.