Radeon HD 7610M
VS
GeForce GTS 360M

Radeon HD 7610M vs GeForce GTS 360M

AMD

Radeon HD 7610M

2011Core: 725 MHzBoost: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 360M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7610M is positioned at rank 213 and the GeForce GTS 360M is on rank 1, so the GeForce GTS 360M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7610M

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
89%
#203
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
429%
#205
389%
#206
388%
#210
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
353%
#211
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
351%
#213
Radeon HD 7610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
96%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#222
92%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
90%
#228
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 360M

#1
GeForce GTS 360M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
85%
#8
77%
#9
77%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
70%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTS 360M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7610M.

InsightRadeon HD 7610MGeForce GTS 360M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTS 360M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7610M and GeForce GTS 360M

AMD

Radeon HD 7610M

The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 360M

The GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7610M scores 632 and the GeForce GTS 360M reaches 641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7610M is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTS 360M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7610M) vs 384 (GeForce GTS 360M). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 360M). Boost clocks: 725 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 7610MGeForce GTS 360M
G3D Mark Score
632
641+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS
0.7296 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
725 MHz
950 MHz+31%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
48 KB+50%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7610MGeForce GTS 360M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 7610MGeForce GTS 360M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7610M draws 20W versus the GeForce GTS 360M's 45W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7610M) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 360M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon HD 7610MGeForce GTS 360M
TDP
20W-56%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
31.6+123%
14.2