Radeon HD 7610M vs Radeon R8 M365DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 7610M is positioned at rank #213 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7610M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

89%

#203

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

429%

#205

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

389%

#206

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

388%

#210

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

353%

#211

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

351%

#213

Radeon HD 7610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

96%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

92%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

90%

#228

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R8 M365DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7610M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon HD 7610M	Radeon R8 M365DX
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R8 M365DX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 7610M Benchmark Check

Radeon R8 M365DX Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7610M and Radeon R8 M365DX

Radeon HD 7610M

The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.

Radeon R8 M365DX

The Radeon R8 M365DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7610M scores 632 and the Radeon R8 M365DX reaches 647 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7610M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R8 M365DX uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7610M) vs 640 (Radeon R8 M365DX). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R8 M365DX). Boost clocks: 725 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 7610M	Radeon R8 M365DX
G3D Mark Score	632	647+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480	640+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.696 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+70%
Boost Clock	725 MHz	925 MHz+28%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	48 KB	160 KB+233%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7610M	Radeon R8 M365DX
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7610M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R8 M365DX has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7610M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon HD 7610M	Radeon R8 M365DX
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7610M draws 20W versus the Radeon R8 M365DX's 30W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7610M) vs 350W (Radeon R8 M365DX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.