FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 7610M

FirePro V3900

2011Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7610M

2011Core: 725 MHzBoost: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 7610M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 7610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3900

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 650% higher power demand at 150W vs 20W.

Radeon HD 7610M

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 20W instead of 150W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7610M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (632 vs 631), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V3900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V3900 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 7610M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 7610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V3900

The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7610M

The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3900 scores 631 and the Radeon HD 7610M reaches 632 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 7610M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V3900) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7610M). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V3900) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M).

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 7610M
G3D Mark Score
631
632
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1280+167%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS+167%
0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+567%
48 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 7610M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3900 and System on the Radeon HD 7610M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V3900) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7610M) — the FirePro V3900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 7610M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3900 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7610M's 20W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3900) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 7610M
TDP
150W
20W-87%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
4.2
31.6+652%