FirePro V3900 vs GRID K160Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3900 vs GRID K160Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V3900 vs GRID K160Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3900

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5% HIGHER MSRP
$125 MSRPvs$119 MSRP
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V3900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (631 vs 628), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V3900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro V3900 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6 cheaper on MSRP at $119 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5.5% (5.3 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro V3900 vs GRID K160Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V3900

The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3900 scores 631 and the GRID K160Q reaches 628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V3900) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V3900) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).

Feature	FirePro V3900	GRID K160Q
G3D Mark Score	631	628
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	128+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V3900	GRID K160Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q carries 512 MB. FirePro V3900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3900 and 64-bit on the GRID K160Q.

Feature	FirePro V3900	GRID K160Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3900 draws 150W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro V3900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3900) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro V3900	GRID K160Q
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	4.2+50%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3900 came in at $119, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125. On MSRP, FirePro V3900 was 4.8% cheaper ($6 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.3 (FirePro V3900) vs 5.0 (GRID K160Q) — the FirePro V3900 offers 6% better value. The newer card here is GRID K160Q (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro V3900	GRID K160Q
MSRP	$119-5%	$125
Performance per Dollar	5.3+6%	5.0
Codename	Cayman	GK104
Release	May 24 2011	June 28 2013
Ranking	#656	#589

Search FirePro V3900 on Amazon

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.