FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3900

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V3900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (631 vs 629), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro V3900 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $119 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.3% (5.3 vs 5.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro V3900 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V3900

The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3900 scores 631 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B reaches 629 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B uses Bristol Ridge, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V3900) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V3900) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B).

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
G3D Mark Score	631	629
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1280	4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+2478%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B carries 512 MB. FirePro V3900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3900 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V3900) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3900 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro V3900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3900) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
TDP	150W-50%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	4.2+100%	2.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3900 came in at $119, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.3 (FirePro V3900) vs 5.3 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B (2025 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP	$119	$119
Performance per Dollar	5.3	5.3
Codename	Cayman	Navi 48
Release	May 24 2011	July 23 2025
Ranking	#656	#23

Search FirePro V3900 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.