
Quadro K510M vs Radeon HD 7610M

Quadro K510M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K510M is positioned at rank 332 and the Radeon HD 7610M is on rank 213, so the Radeon HD 7610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K510M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K510M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7610M.
| Insight | Quadro K510M | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K510M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K510M and Radeon HD 7610M

Quadro K510M
The Quadro K510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

Radeon HD 7610M
The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K510M scores 641 and the Radeon HD 7610M reaches 632 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K510M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7610M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K510M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7610M). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K510M) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M).
| Feature | Quadro K510M | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 641+1% | 632 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+220% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.369 TFLOPS+240% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+167% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K510M | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K510M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7610M) — the Quadro K510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K510M | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K510M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 7610M's 20W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K510M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K510M | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 20W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4 | 31.6+394% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











