GRID K1 vs Quadro K510M

GRID K1

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID K1 vs Quadro K510M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K1 vs Quadro K510M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K1

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,140 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quadro K510M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID K1 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (651 vs 641), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K1 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K1 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID K1 vs Quadro K510M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K1

The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.

NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

The Quadro K510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K1 scores 651 and the Quadro K510M reaches 641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K1 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K510M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K1) vs 1,536 (Quadro K510M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K510M).

FeatureGRID K1Quadro K510M
G3D Mark Score
651+2%
641
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536 ×2
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS ×2
2.369 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs
32 ×2
32
TMUs
128 ×2
128
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K1Quadro K510M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K1 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K510M carries 1 GB. Quadro K510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K1 and 64-bit on the Quadro K510M.

FeatureGRID K1Quadro K510M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K1 draws 225W versus the Quadro K510M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro K510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K1) vs 350W (Quadro K510M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID K1Quadro K510M
TDP
225W
100W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
2.9
6.4+121%