GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 140

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID K1

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 140

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,041 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
  • Delivers 4126.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.
  • Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K1

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 4081.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,140 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($4,140 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 140 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (658 vs 651), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 140 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 140 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,041 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $4,140, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4126.8% (6.6 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 140

The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GRID K1

The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the GRID K1 reaches 651 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the GRID K1 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 1,536 (GRID K1). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1).

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID K1
G3D Mark Score
658+1%
651
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536 ×2+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS ×2+200%
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
32
128 ×2+300%
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 140 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K1 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID K1
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 140 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K1 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 140 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 140 and 64-bit on the GRID K1. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 140) vs 512 KB (GRID K1) — the GRID K1 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID K1
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 140) vs 12_0 (GRID K1). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID K1
DirectX
10.0
12_0+20%
Max Displays
2
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the GRID K1's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 140 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (GRID K1). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID K1
TDP
64W-72%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
10.3+255%
2.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 140 came in at $99, while the GRID K1 launched at $4140. On MSRP, GeForce GT 140 was 97.6% cheaper ($4041 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.2 (GRID K1) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 3200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 140 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID K1
MSRP
$99-98%
$4140
Performance per Dollar
6.6+3200%
0.2
Codename
GK107
GK104
Release
May 29 2014
May 11 2013
Ranking
#777
#611

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.