
GeForce GT 140

GRID K1
GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 140
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,041 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4126.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID K1
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌4081.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,140 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($4,140 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K1 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 140
The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.

GRID K1
The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the GRID K1 reaches 651 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the GRID K1 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 1,536 (GRID K1). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 658+1% | 651 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536 ×2+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+200% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128 ×2+300% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 140 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K1 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 140 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K1 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 140 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 140 and 64-bit on the GRID K1. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 140) vs 512 KB (GRID K1) — the GRID K1 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 140) vs 12_0 (GRID K1). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12_0+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the GRID K1's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 140 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (GRID K1). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-72% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+255% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 140 came in at $99, while the GRID K1 launched at $4140. On MSRP, GeForce GT 140 was 97.6% cheaper ($4041 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.2 (GRID K1) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 3200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 140 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-98% | $4140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6+3200% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GK107 | GK104 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #777 | #611 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














