GeForce GT 140
VS
GRID RTX6000-2Q

GeForce GT 140 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 140

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 140 is positioned at rank 188 and the GRID RTX6000-2Q is on rank 414, so the GeForce GT 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 140

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1091%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1048%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1036%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1034%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1032%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1026%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1013%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1009%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1000%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
997%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
985%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
983%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
965%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
965%
#96
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
93%
#173
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1203%
#188
GeForce GT 140
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#189
GeForce GT 530
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#190
GeForce GT 620
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
99%
#191
Radeon R7 A8-7600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $25
98%
#192
GeForce GTS 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
97%
#193
RADEON HD6370D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#194
Radeon HD 7310
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
96%
#195
GeForce GT 625
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
94%
#196
Radeon HD 5600/5700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
93%
#197
GeForce GT 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
93%
#199
GeForce GT 705
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
93%
#200
Radeon HD 7340
MSRP: $25|Avg: $5
92%
#201
Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
89%
#202
GeForce GT 320
MSRP: $79|Avg: $30
89%
#203
Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-2Q

#399
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
147730%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
100%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
90%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
80%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
80%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
70%
#421
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
60%
#422
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
60%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
50%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
40%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
20%
#426
Quadro FX 2000
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40
10%
#427
GRID V100-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
0%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 140 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID RTX6000-2Q.

InsightGeForce GT 140GRID RTX6000-2Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 140 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 140 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $1,500), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 9930.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 140GRID RTX6000-2Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+9930.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 140 and GRID RTX6000-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 140

The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-2Q

The GRID RTX6000-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 656 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the GRID RTX6000-2Q reaches 656 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the GRID RTX6000-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-2Q).

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID RTX6000-2Q
G3D Mark Score
658
656
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+533%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
32 KB
768 KB+2300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID RTX6000-2Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 140 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-2Q has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 140 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 140) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-2Q) — the GRID RTX6000-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID RTX6000-2Q
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the GRID RTX6000-2Q's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 140 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID RTX6000-2Q
TDP
64W-72%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
10.3+255%
2.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 140 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID RTX6000-2Q launched at $6300 and now averages $1500. The GeForce GT 140 costs 99% less ($1485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.9 (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.4 (GRID RTX6000-2Q) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 10875% better value. The GRID RTX6000-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GT 140GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP
$99-98%
$6300
Avg Price (30d)
$15-99%
$1500
Performance per Dollar
43.9+10875%
0.4
Codename
GK107
GM204
Release
May 29 2014
August 30 2015
Ranking
#777
#433