GeForce GT 140 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2
GeForce GT 140
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 4700 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 140 is positioned at rank 188 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 is on rank 401, so the GeForce GT 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 140
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4700 X2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 140 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 140 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 140.
| Insight | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 4700 X2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 140 and Quadro FX 4700 X2
GeForce GT 140
The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.
Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 658 | 676+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS+65% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 140 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 140) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GT 140 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce GT 140 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+129% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 140 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.9 (GeForce GT 140) vs 45.1 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 2.7% better value. The GeForce GT 140 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-97% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.9 | 45.1+3% |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | May 29 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #777 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 140 and Quadro FX 4700 X2
