
GeForce GT 140

Quadro FX 4700 X2
GeForce GT 140 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 140 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 140 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 140
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2848.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 64W instead of 150W, a 86W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4700 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 4700 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅41.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2929.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌134.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 64W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 140 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 140
The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.

Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 658 | 676+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS+65% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 140 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 140 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 140 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 140) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GT 140 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce GT 140 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+129% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 140 came in at $99, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999. On MSRP, GeForce GT 140 was 96.7% cheaper ($2900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 3200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 140 (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-97% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6+3200% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | May 29 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #777 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














