GeForce 810A vs GeForce GT 140
GeForce 810A
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 140
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 810A is positioned at rank 433 and the GeForce GT 140 is on rank 188, so the GeForce GT 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 140
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 140 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810A.
| Insight | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 140 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 140 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 33.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 810A and GeForce GT 140
GeForce 810A
The GeForce 810A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.
GeForce GT 140
The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 810A scores 655 and the GeForce GT 140 reaches 658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 140 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 810A) vs 384 (GeForce GT 140). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 810A) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140).
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 655 | 658 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 810A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 140 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 140 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810A) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 140) — the GeForce 810A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 810A) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 140). Vulkan: 1.1 vs None. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+10% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.5+36% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 810A) vs No (GeForce GT 140). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 810A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 140).
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 810A draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 140's 64W — a 63.9% difference. The GeForce 810A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810A) vs 350W (GeForce GT 140). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-48% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 19.8+92% | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 810A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GT 140 launched at $99 and now averages $15. The GeForce GT 140 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.8 (GeForce 810A) vs 43.9 (GeForce GT 140) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 33.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $99-1% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.8 | 43.9+34% |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #832 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 810A and GeForce GT 140
