
FirePro M7740 vs GeForce 810A

FirePro M7740
Popular choices:

GeForce 810A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M7740 is positioned at rank 329 and the GeForce 810A is on rank 433, so the FirePro M7740 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M7740
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M7740 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810A.
| Insight | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 810A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 810A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2362.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2362.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M7740 and GeForce 810A

FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

GeForce 810A
The GeForce 810A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the GeForce 810A reaches 655 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 810A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 256 (GeForce 810A). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 810A).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 665+2% | 655 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+17% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M7740 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 810A has 512 MB. The FirePro M7740 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M7740) vs 1 MB (GeForce 810A) — the GeForce 810A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro M7740) vs 11.0 (GeForce 810A). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.0+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5+36% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M7740) vs No (GeForce 810A). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 810A).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the GeForce 810A's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 810A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 350W (GeForce 810A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 20.2+2% | 19.8 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M7740 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce 810A launched at $100 and now averages $20. The GeForce 810A costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.3 (FirePro M7740) vs 32.8 (GeForce 810A) — the GeForce 810A offers 2423.1% better value. The GeForce 810A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $100-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $20-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 32.8+2423% |
| Codename | Chelsea | GM108 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #752 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












