GeForce 810A vs GRID K340
GeForce 810A
Popular choices:
GRID K340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 810A is positioned at rank 433 and the GRID K340 is on rank 404, so the GRID K340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810A
Performance Per Dollar GRID K340
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 810A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K340.
| Insight | GeForce 810A | GRID K340 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 810A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 810A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $57), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 187.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 810A | GRID K340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+187.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($57) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 810A and GRID K340
GeForce 810A
The GeForce 810A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.
GRID K340
The GRID K340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 384 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 650 points. Launch price was $3,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 810A scores 655 and the GRID K340 reaches 650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810A is built on Maxwell while the GRID K340 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 810A) vs 384 (GRID K340). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 810A) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS ×4 (GRID K340).
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K340 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 655 | 650 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384 ×4+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.7296 TFLOPS ×4+24% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 ×4 |
| TMUs | 16 | 32 ×4+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K340 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810A) vs 0.13 MB (GRID K340) — the GeForce 810A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K340 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 810A draws 33W versus the GRID K340's 225W — a 148.8% difference. The GeForce 810A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810A) vs 350W (GRID K340). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K340 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-85% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 19.8+583% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 810A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID K340 launched at $3299 and now averages $57. The GeForce 810A costs 64.9% less ($37 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.8 (GeForce 810A) vs 11.4 (GRID K340) — the GeForce 810A offers 187.7% better value. The GeForce 810A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-97% | $3299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-65% | $57 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.8+188% | 11.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #832 | #817 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 810A and GRID K340
