
GeForce 810A

GRID K1
GeForce 810A vs GRID K1 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 810A vs GRID K1 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce 810A vs GRID K1: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 810A
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,040 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4065.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 225W, a 192W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID K1
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌4040% HIGHER MSRP$4,140 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($4,140 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌581.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 810A vs GRID K1 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 810A
The GeForce 810A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.

GRID K1
The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 810A scores 655 and the GRID K1 reaches 651 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810A is built on Maxwell while the GRID K1 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 810A) vs 1,536 (GRID K1). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 810A) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1).
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 655 | 651 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536 ×2+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+289% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 ×2+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 128 ×2+700% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 810A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K1 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 810A and 64-bit on the GRID K1. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810A) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K1) — the GeForce 810A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 810A) vs 12_0 (GRID K1). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 810A draws 33W versus the GRID K1's 225W — a 148.8% difference. The GeForce 810A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810A) vs 350W (GRID K1). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-85% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 19.8+583% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 810A came in at $100, while the GRID K1 launched at $4140. On MSRP, GeForce 810A was 97.6% cheaper ($4040 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.5 (GeForce 810A) vs 0.2 (GRID K1) — the GeForce 810A offers 3150% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 810A (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 810A | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-98% | $4140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5+3150% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK104 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #832 | #611 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














