GeForce 810A
VS
FirePro M7740

GeForce 810A vs FirePro M7740

NVIDIA

GeForce 810A

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
VS

FirePro M7740

2012Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 810A is positioned at rank 433 and the FirePro M7740 is on rank 329, so the FirePro M7740 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810A

#423
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1658%
#425
1503%
#426
1499%
#430
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1363%
#431
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1353%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
99%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
99%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#438
Radeon R3
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#439
95%
#441
Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#443
Radeon R9 M360
MSRP: $300|Avg: $81
93%
#444
Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
92%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
91%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
90%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
90%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M7740

#314
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11108%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
98%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
97%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
96%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
95%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
95%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
95%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
94%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
93%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
92%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
88%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
86%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
81%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
80%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M7740 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810A.

InsightGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 810A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 810A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2362.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2362.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 810A and FirePro M7740

NVIDIA

GeForce 810A

The GeForce 810A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.

AMD

FirePro M7740

The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 810A scores 655 and the FirePro M7740 reaches 665 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810A is built on Maxwell while the FirePro M7740 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 810A) vs 512 (FirePro M7740). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 810A) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740).

FeatureGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
G3D Mark Score
655
665+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
0.6912 TFLOPS+17%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 810A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M7740 has 1 GB. The FirePro M7740 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810A) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M7740) — the GeForce 810A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 810A) vs 10.1 (FirePro M7740). Vulkan: 1.1 vs None. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
DirectX
11.0+9%
10.1
Vulkan
1.1
None
OpenGL
4.5+36%
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 810A) vs None (FirePro M7740). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 810A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740).

FeatureGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 810A draws 33W versus the FirePro M7740's 33W — a 0% difference. The FirePro M7740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810A) vs 350W (FirePro M7740). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
TDP
33W
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
19.8
20.2+2%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 810A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro M7740 launched at $500 and now averages $500. The GeForce 810A costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.8 (GeForce 810A) vs 1.3 (FirePro M7740) — the GeForce 810A offers 2423.1% better value. The GeForce 810A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 810AFirePro M7740
MSRP
$100-80%
$500
Avg Price (30d)
$20-96%
$500
Performance per Dollar
32.8+2423%
1.3
Codename
GM108
Chelsea
Release
July 22 2014
June 27 2012
Ranking
#832
#752