GeForce GT 140
VS
GeForce GT 735M

GeForce GT 140 vs GeForce GT 735M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 140

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 735M

2013Core: 980 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 140 is positioned at rank 188 and the GeForce GT 735M is on rank 231, so the GeForce GT 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 140

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1091%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1048%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1036%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1034%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1032%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1026%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1013%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1009%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1000%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
997%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
985%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
983%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
965%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
965%
#96
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
93%
#173
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1203%
#188
GeForce GT 140
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#189
GeForce GT 530
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#190
GeForce GT 620
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
99%
#191
Radeon R7 A8-7600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $25
98%
#192
GeForce GTS 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
97%
#193
RADEON HD6370D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#194
Radeon HD 7310
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
96%
#195
GeForce GT 625
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
94%
#196
Radeon HD 5600/5700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
93%
#197
GeForce GT 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
93%
#199
GeForce GT 705
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
93%
#200
Radeon HD 7340
MSRP: $25|Avg: $5
92%
#201
Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
89%
#202
GeForce GT 320
MSRP: $79|Avg: $30
89%
#203
Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 735M

#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
99%
#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
91%
#221
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
497%
#223
451%
#224
450%
#228
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
409%
#229
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
406%
#231
GeForce GT 735M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#235
Radeon RX 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
99%
#236
Radeon HD 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
98%
#237
Radeon HD 7570M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15
96%
#239
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
95%
#240
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 140 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 735M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 140 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 140 and GeForce GT 735M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 140

The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 735M

The GeForce GT 735M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the GeForce GT 735M reaches 655 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 735M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 384 (GeForce GT 735M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 735M).

FeatureGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
G3D Mark Score
658
655
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS+1%
0.7526 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 140 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 735M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 735M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 140) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 735M). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
DirectX
10.0
11.0+10%
Vulkan
None
1.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.2+27%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 140) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 735M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 140) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 735M).

FeatureGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
Encoder
No
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the GeForce GT 735M's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce GT 735M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (GeForce GT 735M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
TDP
64W
50W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
10.3
13.1+27%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 140 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 140GeForce GT 735M
MSRP
$99
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
GK107
GK107
Release
May 29 2014
June 25 2013
Ranking
#777
#726