GeForce GT 140
NVS 510
GeForce GT 140 vs NVS 510 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 140 vs NVS 510 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GT 140 vs NVS 510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 140
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 338.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌43.1% longer card at 229mm vs 160mm.
NVS 510
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 229mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌353.5% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 140 vs NVS 510 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 140
The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.
NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 658 | 680+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512 ×2+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+39% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 140 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 510 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 140 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 carries 2 GB. NVS 510 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 140 and 64-bit on the NVS 510. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 140) vs 1 MB (NVS 510) — the NVS 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 140) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12 (11_0)+20% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 140) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 140) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 6.1% difference. The GeForce GT 140 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-6% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+3% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 140 came in at $99, while the NVS 510 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce GT 140 was 78% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 140) vs 1.5 (NVS 510) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 340% better value. The newer card here is NVS 510 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-78% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6+340% | 1.5 |
| Codename | GK107 | GM107 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #777 | #826 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 140 and NVS 510
