
GRID K1

Radeon HD 2900 XT
GRID K1 vs Radeon HD 2900 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K1 vs Radeon HD 2900 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID K1 vs Radeon HD 2900 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K1
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌937.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,140 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($4,140 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.
Radeon HD 2900 XT
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,741 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 951.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K1 vs Radeon HD 2900 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K1
The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Radeon HD 2900 XT
The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K1 scores 651 and the Radeon HD 2900 XT reaches 660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K1 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 2900 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K1) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT).
| Feature | GRID K1 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 651 | 660+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+220% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+229% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+167% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K1 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K1 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2900 XT carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 2900 XT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K1 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2900 XT. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K1) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 2900 XT) — the GRID K1 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K1 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GRID K1) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID K1 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0+20% | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K1 draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 2900 XT's 25W — a 160% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K1) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID K1 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 25W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 26.4+810% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K1 came in at $4140, while the Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2900 XT was 90.4% cheaper ($3741 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GRID K1) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) — the Radeon HD 2900 XT offers 750% better value.
| Feature | GRID K1 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4140 | $399-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 1.7+750% |
| Codename | GK104 | Thames |
| Release | May 11 2013 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #611 | #883 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














