GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 7610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 7610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 7610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1025% higher power demand at 225W vs 20W.

Radeon HD 7610M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 20W instead of 225W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $125 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7610M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (632 vs 628), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K160Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K160Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 7610M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 7610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

Radeon HD 7610M

The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K160Q scores 628 and the Radeon HD 7610M reaches 632 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K160Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7610M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K160Q) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7610M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 7610M
G3D Mark Score	628	632
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+220%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+229%	0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+167%	48 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 7610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K160Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7610M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7610M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K160Q and System on the Radeon HD 7610M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K160Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7610M) — the GRID K160Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 7610M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K160Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 7610M's 20W — a 167.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K160Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 7610M
TDP	225W	20W-91%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	2.8	31.6+1029%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID K160Q (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 7610M
MSRP	$125	—
Codename	GK104	Thames
Release	June 28 2013	December 25 2011
Ranking	#589	#928

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7610M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.