Radeon HD 7620G vs Quadro FX 3700

Radeon HD 7620G

2012Core: 600 MHz

Quadro FX 3700

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon HD 7620G

357

0.0%

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

372

+4.2%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7620G is positioned at rank 415 and the Quadro FX 3700 is on rank 401, so the Quadro FX 3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7620G

#405

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1521%

#407

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1378%

#408

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1375%

#412

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1250%

#413

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1242%

#415

Radeon HD 7620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#416

Radeon R9 M390X

MSRP: $550|Avg: $120

99%

#417

Arc 8-Core iGPU

MSRP: $503|Avg: $400

97%

#418

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $20

97%

#419

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

96%

#420

Radeon R9 M385

MSRP: $300|Avg: $60

96%

#421

Radeon R5 235

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

96%

#422

Radeon R9 M375X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

96%

#423

Radeon HD 6620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

96%

#424

Radeon R5 310

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

95%

#425

Radeon HD 7690M XT

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

#426

Radeon HD 7600G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

94%

#427

Radeon R7 A265

MSRP: $149|Avg: $149

93%

#428

Radeon R9 M470

MSRP: $350|Avg: $80

93%

#429

Radeon R9 M385X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700

#385

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

64230%

#400

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

100%

#401

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

100%

#402

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

96%

#403

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

87%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

87%

#406

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

78%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

74%

#409

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

70%

#410

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

70%

#412

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

52%

#413

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

43%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7620G.

Insight	Radeon HD 7620G	Quadro FX 3700
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7620G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7620G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $500), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4698.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon HD 7620G	Quadro FX 3700
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4698.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 7620G Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 3700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7620G and Quadro FX 3700

Radeon HD 7620G

The Radeon HD 7620G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.

Quadro FX 3700

The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7620G scores 357 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7620G is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700).

Feature	Radeon HD 7620G	Quadro FX 3700
G3D Mark Score	357	372+4%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	480+100%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7620G	Quadro FX 3700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon HD 7620G	Quadro FX 3700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon HD 7620G	Quadro FX 3700
DirectX	11.2+12%	10_0
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7620G draws 45W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon HD 7620G	Quadro FX 3700
TDP	45W-76%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	229mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Perf/Watt	7.9+295%	2.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7620G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 7620G costs 98% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) — the Radeon HD 7620G offers 5000% better value. The Radeon HD 7620G is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).