
Radeon HD 7620G vs Radeon HD4670

Radeon HD 7620G
Popular choices:

Radeon HD4670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7620G is positioned at rank 415 and the Radeon HD4670 is on rank 216, so the Radeon HD4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7620G
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD4670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7620G.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7620G | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7620G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7620G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7620G | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7620G and Radeon HD4670

Radeon HD 7620G
The Radeon HD 7620G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.

Radeon HD4670
The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7620G scores 357 and the Radeon HD4670 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7620G is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD4670). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 357 | 366+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1536+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+369% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 192 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD4670) — the Radeon HD4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7620G draws 45W versus the Radeon HD4670's 250W — a 139% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 300W (Radeon HD4670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-82% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.9+427% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7620G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD4670 launched at $67 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 7620G costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (Radeon HD 7620G) vs 24.4 (Radeon HD4670) — the Radeon HD 7620G offers 46.3% better value. The Radeon HD 7620G is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-25% | $67 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.7+46% | 24.4 |
| Codename | Turks | Cayman |
| Release | January 5 2012 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #870 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















