
GeForce GT 335M vs Radeon HD 7620G

GeForce GT 335M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7620G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 335M is positioned at rank 131 and the Radeon HD 7620G is on rank 415, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7620G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 335M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7620G.
| Insight | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7620G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7620G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $25), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 142.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+142.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 335M and Radeon HD 7620G

GeForce GT 335M
The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.

Radeon HD 7620G
The Radeon HD 7620G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 335M scores 368 and the Radeon HD 7620G reaches 357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 335M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7620G uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7620G). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7620G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 368+3% | 357 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS+31% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 48 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 335M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7620G has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 335M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7620G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 335M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7620G). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 335M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7620G's 45W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 335M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7620G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 45W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4 | 7.9+7% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7620G costs 60% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 35.7 (Radeon HD 7620G) — the Radeon HD 7620G offers 142.9% better value. The GeForce GT 335M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $10-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 35.7+143% |
| Codename | GK107 | Turks |
| Release | June 25 2013 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #726 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















