GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 7620G

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 705

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7620G

2012Core: 600 MHz

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 7620G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 7620G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 7620G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 705

2014

Why buy it

  • 0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20% HIGHER MSRP
    $60 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 42.2% higher power demand at 64W vs 45W.
  • 14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.

Radeon HD 7620G

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Delivers 15.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 64W, a 19W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 705 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 705 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (370 vs 357), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 705 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7620G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.8% (7.1 vs 6.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7620G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 705 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 7620G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 705

The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon HD 7620G

The Radeon HD 7620G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 705 scores 370 and the Radeon HD 7620G reaches 357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 705 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7620G uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 705) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7620G). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7620G).

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 7620G
G3D Mark Score
370+4%
357
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS+32%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
48 KB+50%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 705 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7620G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 7620G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 705 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7620G carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 705 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 705 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7620G.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 7620G
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 705) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7620G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 7620G
DirectX
11.0
11.2+2%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 705) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7620G). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 7620G
Encoder
No
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 705 draws 64W versus the Radeon HD 7620G's 45W — a 34.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 705) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7620G). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 7620G
TDP
64W
45W-30%
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
5.8
7.9+36%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 705 came in at $60, while the Radeon HD 7620G launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7620G was 16.7% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (GeForce GT 705) vs 7.1 (Radeon HD 7620G) — the Radeon HD 7620G offers 14.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 705 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP
$60
$50-17%
Performance per Dollar
6.2
7.1+15%
Codename
GK107
Turks
Release
May 29 2014
January 5 2012
Ranking
#777
#870

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.