Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M260X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7670A

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M260X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
39% HIGHER MSRP
$139 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M260X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7670A instead at 1,050 vs 1,013, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7670A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7670A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $39 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44.1% (10.5 vs 7.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M260X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7670A

The Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,050 points.

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670A scores 1,050 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670A is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670A	Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score	1,050+4%	1,013
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480+25%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS+5%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	48 KB	96 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7670A	Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7670A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670A	Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670A draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 7670A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670A	Radeon R7 M260X
TDP	45W-40%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	23.3+73%	13.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7670A came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7670A was 28.1% cheaper ($39 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 7.3 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon HD 7670A offers 43.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670A	Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP	$100-28%	$139
Performance per Dollar	10.5+44%	7.3
Codename	Turks	Opal
Release	January 5 2012	December 6 2015
Ranking	#870	#878

Search Radeon HD 7670A on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.