Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M465

AMD

Radeon HD 7670A

2012Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M465

2016Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M465 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7670A

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • Delivers 19% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M465

2016

Why buy it

  • 12.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20% HIGHER MSRP
    $120 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,059 vs 1,050), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7670A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7670A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 19% (10.5 vs 8.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M465 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R7 M465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7670A

The Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,050 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670A scores 1,050 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670A is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465).

FeatureRadeon HD 7670ARadeon R7 M465
G3D Mark Score
1,050
1,059
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
0.864 TFLOPS+50%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
48 KB
96 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7670ARadeon R7 M465
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon HD 7670A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670ARadeon R7 M465
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670A draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 7670A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670ARadeon R7 M465
TDP
45W-40%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
23.3+65%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7670A came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7670A was 16.7% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Radeon HD 7670A) vs 8.8 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon HD 7670A offers 19.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M465 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7670ARadeon R7 M465
MSRP
$100-17%
$120
Performance per Dollar
10.5+19%
8.8
Codename
Turks
Topaz
Release
January 5 2012
May 15 2016
Ranking
#870
#867

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.