Radeon HD 7670M
VS
Quadro FX 1800M

Radeon HD 7670M vs Quadro FX 1800M

AMD

Radeon HD 7670M

2012Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7670M is positioned at rank 325 and the Quadro FX 1800M is on rank 62, so the Quadro FX 1800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670M

#315
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
798%
#317
724%
#318
722%
#322
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
656%
#323
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
652%
#325
Radeon HD 7670M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
99%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
95%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
94%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
94%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
91%
#336
90%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
89%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1800M

#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
96%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
95%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
95%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
91%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
89%
#47
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
608%
#62
Quadro FX 1800M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#63
T400 4GB
MSRP: $159|Avg: $99
98%
#64
Radeon Pro 5300
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
98%
#69
Radeon Pro W5500
MSRP: $399|Avg: $300
92%
#72
Quadro P2200
MSRP: $429|Avg: $227
90%
#73
T1000
MSRP: $350|Avg: $382
90%
#74
Quadro P620
MSRP: $170|Avg: $48
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1800M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7670M.

InsightRadeon HD 7670MQuadro FX 1800M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1800M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7670M and Quadro FX 1800M

AMD

Radeon HD 7670M

The Radeon HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

The Quadro FX 1800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 486 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670M scores 476 and the Quadro FX 1800M reaches 486 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 1800M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1800M). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800M).

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro FX 1800M
G3D Mark Score
476
486+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1280+433%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS+250%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro FX 1800M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1800M) — the Radeon HD 7670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro FX 1800M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670M draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 1800M's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon HD 7670M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1800M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro FX 1800M
TDP
100W-47%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
4.8+85%
2.6