Radeon HD 7670M
VS
Quadro K500M

Radeon HD 7670M vs Quadro K500M

AMD

Radeon HD 7670M

2012Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

2013Core: 771 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7670M is positioned at rank 325 and the Quadro K500M is on rank 221, so the Quadro K500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670M

#315
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
798%
#317
724%
#318
722%
#322
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
656%
#323
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
652%
#325
Radeon HD 7670M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
99%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
95%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
94%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
94%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
91%
#336
90%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
89%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K500M

#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
92%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
90%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
87%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
87%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
85%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
79%
#205
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
3078%
#221
Quadro K500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#222
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
100%
#223
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
99%
#225
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
95%
#226
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
94%
#230
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7670M.

InsightRadeon HD 7670MQuadro K500M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7670M and Quadro K500M

AMD

Radeon HD 7670M

The Radeon HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

The Quadro K500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 480 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670M scores 476 and the Quadro K500M reaches 480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K500M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 1,536 (Quadro K500M). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K500M).

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro K500M
G3D Mark Score
476
480
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS+9%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro K500M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7670M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K500M has 4 GB. The Quadro K500M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro K500M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670M draws 100W versus the Quadro K500M's 100W — a 0% difference. The Quadro K500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 350W (Quadro K500M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670MQuadro K500M
TDP
100W
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
4.8
4.8