Radeon HD 7690M
VS
GRID M60-0Q

Radeon HD 7690M vs GRID M60-0Q

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M

2011Core: 725 MHzBoost: 725 MHz
VS

GRID M60-0Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 7690M is positioned at rank #238 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7690M

#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
95%
#228
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
522%
#230
473%
#231
472%
#235
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
429%
#236
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
426%
#238
Radeon HD 7690M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#239
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
99%
#240
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
97%
#252
GeForce 720A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
92%
#253
GeForce GT 520M
MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7690M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-0Q.

InsightRadeon HD 7690MGRID M60-0Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7690M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7690M and GRID M60-0Q

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M

The Radeon HD 7690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0Q

The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7690M scores 832 and the GRID M60-0Q reaches 827 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7690M is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M60-0Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7690M) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q). Boost clocks: 725 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MGRID M60-0Q
G3D Mark Score
832
827
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
2048+327%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+593%
Boost Clock
725 MHz
1178 MHz+62%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
48 KB
768 KB+1500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MGRID M60-0Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7690M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-0Q has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7690M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7690M) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) — the GRID M60-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MGRID M60-0Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7690M draws 20W versus the GRID M60-0Q's 225W — a 167.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7690M) vs 350W (GRID M60-0Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MGRID M60-0Q
TDP
20W-91%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
41.6+1024%
3.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M60-0Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MGRID M60-0Q
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$500
Codename
Thames
GM204
Release
December 25 2011
August 30 2015
Ranking
#928
#433