Radeon HD 7690M vs Radeon R7 M365X

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M

2011Core: 725 MHzBoost: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M365X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7690M vs Radeon R7 M365X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7690M vs Radeon R7 M365X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7690M vs Radeon R7 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7690M

2011

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 20W instead of 75W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M365X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M365X

2016

Why buy it

  • 9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 275% higher power demand at 75W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M365X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7690M instead at 832 vs 824, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7690M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M365X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M365X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 7690M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 7690M vs Radeon R7 M365X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M

The Radeon HD 7690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M365X

The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7690M scores 832 and the Radeon R7 M365X reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7690M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7690M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M365X). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X). Boost clocks: 725 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MRadeon R7 M365X
G3D Mark Score
832
824
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
512+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS
0.9472 TFLOPS+36%
Boost Clock
725 MHz
925 MHz+28%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
48 KB
128 KB+167%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MRadeon R7 M365X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7690M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M365X carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7690M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 7690M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M365X.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MRadeon R7 M365X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7690M draws 20W versus the Radeon R7 M365X's 75W — a 115.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7690M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M365X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MRadeon R7 M365X
TDP
20W-73%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
41.6+278%
11.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M365X (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 7690MRadeon R7 M365X
MSRP
$300
Codename
Thames
Tropo
Release
December 25 2011
May 15 2016
Ranking
#928
#715

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.