
Radeon HD 7700-serie vs GeForce GTX 645

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 645 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7700-serie | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $35), it costs 43% less, resulting in a 73.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7700-serie | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+73.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7700-serie and GeForce GTX 645

Radeon HD 7700-serie
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7700-serie scores 1,899 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7700-serie is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 645 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 645). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,899+1% | 1,880 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+482% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS+343% | 0.8554 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+191% | 44 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 704 KB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7700-serie comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7700-serie draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 147mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.6 | 9.4+24% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 42.9% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.3 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 73.1% better value. The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $150-6% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $20-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.3 | 94.0+73% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GF100 |
| Release | January 9 2012 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #431 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















