
Radeon HD 7700-serie vs Quadro 5000

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Popular choices:

Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 400% more VRAM (3 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7700-serie.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7700-serie | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+400%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7700-serie offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7700-serie holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $100), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 176.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7700-serie | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+176.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7700-serie and Quadro 5000

Radeon HD 7700-serie
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.

Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7700-serie scores 1,899 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7700-serie is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,899 | 1,963+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+482% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS+425% | 0.7223 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 128+191% | 44 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 704 KB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+20% | 640 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7700-serie comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 has 3 GB. The Quadro 5000 offers 400% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 640 KB (Quadro 5000) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2.5 GB+400% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+20% | 640 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7700-serie draws 250W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 48.8% difference. The Quadro 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 152W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 7.6 | 12.9+70% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $100. The Radeon HD 7700-serie costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.3 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 19.6 (Quadro 5000) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie offers 177% better value. The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7700-serie | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-94% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-65% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.3+177% | 19.6 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GF100 |
| Release | January 9 2012 | February 23 2011 |
| Ranking | #431 | #687 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















