Radeon HD 7700-serie vs Quadro M520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M520

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

94%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

90%

#130

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1544%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

99%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

98%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

96%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

96%

#151

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

95%

#152

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#154

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

94%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

92%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

90%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

88%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7700-serie.

Insight	Radeon HD 7700-serie	Quadro M520
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7700-serie offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7700-serie holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 41.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon HD 7700-serie	Quadro M520
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+41.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($35)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 7700-serie Benchmark Check

Quadro M520 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7700-serie and Quadro M520

Radeon HD 7700-serie

The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.

Quadro M520

The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7700-serie scores 1,899 and the Quadro M520 reaches 1,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7700-serie is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro M520 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 384 (Quadro M520). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1019 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 7700-serie	Quadro M520
G3D Mark Score	1,899	1,913
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.789 TFLOPS+374%	0.7995 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	925 MHz	1019 MHz+10%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	128+700%	16
L1 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7700-serie	Quadro M520
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7700-serie comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M520 has 2 GB. The Quadro M520 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 1 MB (Quadro M520) — the Quadro M520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 7700-serie	Quadro M520
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7700-serie draws 250W versus the Quadro M520's 25W — a 163.6% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 350W (Quadro M520). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 7700-serie	Quadro M520
TDP	250W	25W-90%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	7.6	76.5+907%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Quadro M520 launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 7700-serie costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.3 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) vs 38.3 (Quadro M520) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie offers 41.8% better value. The Quadro M520 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).