GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro M520
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Quadro M520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M520
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro M520?
The comparison between the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the ultra-mobile Quadro M520 reveals a monumental performance divide. The RTX 3060 Ti is roughly 5000% more powerful, representing the jump from a basic office laptop accelerator to a dedicated high-performance gaming desktop. This is a transformation upgrade that turns unplayable legacy stutters into silk-smooth 1440p Ultra gameplay.
Technically, the RTX 3060 Ti features 8GB of dedicated fast GDDR6 VRAM and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS. The Quadro M520 features only 2GB of legacy memory and is based on a decade-old architecture that lacks the core counts for modern 3D software. Moving to a desktop 3060 Ti is a life-changing improvement for any creator or gamer, providing the necessary horsepower for modern rendering and high-end entertainment in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the absolute winner. it represents several generations of rendering progress and provides the stability and detail needed for a world-class PC experience. The Quadro M520 is now strictly for basic office use on legacy notebooks. if you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the RTX 3060 Ti is the definitive choice for enthusiasts.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M520 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 961.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M520.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+961.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-961.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 89.6% better value per dollar than the Quadro M520.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+89.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro M520
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro M520's 1,913 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 961.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro M520 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Quadro M520). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1019 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+962% | 1,913 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+1167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+1926% | 0.7995 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+63% | 1019 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+900% | 8 |
| TMUs | 152+850% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+3592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M520 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro M520) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro M520's 25W — a 155.6% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro M520). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+33% | 76.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Quadro M520 launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Quadro M520 costs 82.1% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 38.3 (Quadro M520) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 89.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $200-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | $50-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.5+89% | 38.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM108 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #695 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro M520
