Radeon HD 7730
VS
FireStream 9250

Radeon HD 7730 vs FireStream 9250

AMD

Radeon HD 7730

2013Core: 800 MHz
VS

FireStream 9250

2008Core: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7730 is positioned at rank 92 and the FireStream 9250 is on rank 340, so the Radeon HD 7730 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7730

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
468%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
449%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
444%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
443%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
442%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
440%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
434%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
433%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
429%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
428%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
422%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
422%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
414%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
414%
#77
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
516%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
94%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
93%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
89%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
80%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
79%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
95%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
92%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
90%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
89%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
87%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
87%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
84%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
81%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9250

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
90%
#325
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
12626%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
100%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
98%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
92%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
91%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
91%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
89%
#347
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
88%
#348
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
88%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
84%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
83%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
81%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
80%
#355
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FireStream 9250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7730.

InsightRadeon HD 7730FireStream 9250
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7730 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7730 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 226.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7730FireStream 9250
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+226.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7730 and FireStream 9250

AMD

Radeon HD 7730

The Radeon HD 7730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $59.

AMD

FireStream 9250

The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7730 scores 1,163 and the FireStream 9250 reaches 1,165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7730 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FireStream 9250 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 7730) vs 800 (FireStream 9250). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7730) vs 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250).

FeatureRadeon HD 7730FireStream 9250
G3D Mark Score
1,163
1,165
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6144 TFLOPS
1 TFLOPS+63%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
96 KB
160 KB+67%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7730FireStream 9250
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 7730FireStream 9250
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7730 draws 47W versus the FireStream 9250's 150W — a 104.6% difference. The Radeon HD 7730 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7730) vs 350W (FireStream 9250). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7730FireStream 9250
TDP
47W-69%
150W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
234mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
24.7+217%
7.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7730 launched at $75 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FireStream 9250 launched at $999 and now averages $49. The Radeon HD 7730 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.5 (Radeon HD 7730) vs 23.8 (FireStream 9250) — the Radeon HD 7730 offers 225.6% better value. The Radeon HD 7730 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 7730FireStream 9250
MSRP
$75-92%
$999
Avg Price (30d)
$15-69%
$49
Performance per Dollar
77.5+226%
23.8
Codename
Cape Verde
RV770
Release
May 1 2013
June 16 2008
Ranking
#841
#840