Radeon HD 7750M
VS
GeForce GTX 295

Radeon HD 7750M vs GeForce GTX 295

AMD

Radeon HD 7750M

2012Core: 575 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

2009Core: 576 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7750M is positioned at rank 353 and the GeForce GTX 295 is on rank 301, so the GeForce GTX 295 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7750M

#343
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
993%
#345
900%
#346
898%
#350
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
817%
#351
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
811%
#353
Radeon HD 7750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
100%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
97%
#361
97%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 295

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3023%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2904%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2870%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2865%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2859%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2843%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2807%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2797%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2771%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2763%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2730%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2724%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2675%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2673%
#286
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3333%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
100%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
99%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#305
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#306
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
95%
#308
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#309
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#311
Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#312
Radeon E6460
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
90%
#313
Radeon HD 6290
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
88%
#314
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
83%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
81%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 295 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+14.3%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 295 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7750M and GeForce GTX 295

AMD

Radeon HD 7750M

The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7750M scores 1,191 and the GeForce GTX 295 reaches 1,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7750M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 295 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 295). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295).

FeatureRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
G3D Mark Score
1,191
1,198
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
512+7%
480 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
0.5962 TFLOPS ×2+1%
ROPs
16
28 ×2+75%
TMUs
32
80 ×2+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB+14%
224 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7750M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7750M offers 14.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) — the Radeon HD 7750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+14%
1.75 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+14%
224 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
DirectX
12+8%
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
6+200%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750M) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295). Decoder: UVD3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7750M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295).

FeatureRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
Encoder
VCE 1.0
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
UVD3
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7750M draws 28W versus the GeForce GTX 295's 289W — a 164.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 680W (GeForce GTX 295). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
TDP
28W-90%
289W
Recommended PSU
350W-49%
680W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-21%
95°C
Perf/Watt
42.5+937%
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7750M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 7750MGeForce GTX 295
MSRP
$499
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
Chelsea
GT200B
Release
April 24 2012
January 8 2009
Ranking
#827
#816